Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpiolib: Fix debug messaging in gpiod_find_and_request()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Op 20-03-2024 om 17:58 schreef Andy Shevchenko:
When consolidating GPIO lookups in ACPI code, the debug messaging
had been reworked that the user may see

   [   13.401147] (NULL device *): using ACPI '\_SB.LEDS.led-0' for '(null)' GPIO lookup
   [   13.401378] gpio gpiochip0: Persistence not supported for GPIO 40
   [   13.401402] gpio-40 (?): no flags found for (null)

instead of

   [   14.182962] gpio gpiochip0: Persistence not supported for GPIO 40
   [   14.182994] gpio-40 (?): no flags found for gpios

The '(null)' parts are less informative and likely scare the users.
Replace them by '(default)' which can point out to the default connection
IDs, such as 'gpios'.

While at it, amend other places where con_id is used in the messages.

Reported-by: Ferry Toth <ftoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 8eb1f71e7acc ("gpiolib: consolidate GPIO lookups")
Suggested-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.c > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: completele reworked solution of
20231019173457.2445119-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index e2e583b40207..7d26e5de0b44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -2401,6 +2401,11 @@ char *gpiochip_dup_line_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_dup_line_label);
+static inline const char *function_name_or_default(const char *con_id)
+{
+	return con_id ?: "(default)";
+}
+
  /**
   * gpiochip_request_own_desc - Allow GPIO chip to request its own descriptor
   * @gc: GPIO chip
@@ -2429,10 +2434,11 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc,
  					    enum gpiod_flags dflags)
  {
  	struct gpio_desc *desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, hwnum);
+	const char *name = function_name_or_default(label);
  	int ret;
if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
-		chip_err(gc, "failed to get GPIO descriptor\n");
+		chip_err(gc, "failed to get GPIO %s descriptor\n", name);
  		return desc;
  	}
@@ -2442,8 +2448,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc, ret = gpiod_configure_flags(desc, label, lflags, dflags);
  	if (ret) {
-		chip_err(gc, "setup of own GPIO %s failed\n", label);
  		gpiod_free_commit(desc);
+		chip_err(gc, "setup of own GPIO %s failed\n", name);
  		return ERR_PTR(ret);
  	}
@@ -4157,19 +4163,17 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_by_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
  					      enum gpiod_flags *flags,
  					      unsigned long *lookupflags)
  {
+	const char *name = function_name_or_default(con_id);
  	struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
-		dev_dbg(consumer, "using DT '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n",
-			fwnode, con_id);
+		dev_dbg(consumer, "using DT '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", fwnode, name);
  		desc = of_find_gpio(to_of_node(fwnode), con_id, idx, lookupflags);
  	} else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
-		dev_dbg(consumer, "using ACPI '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n",
-			fwnode, con_id);
+		dev_dbg(consumer, "using ACPI '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", fwnode, name);
  		desc = acpi_find_gpio(fwnode, con_id, idx, flags, lookupflags);
  	} else if (is_software_node(fwnode)) {
-		dev_dbg(consumer, "using swnode '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n",
-			fwnode, con_id);
+		dev_dbg(consumer, "using swnode '%pfw' for '%s' GPIO lookup\n", fwnode, name);
  		desc = swnode_find_gpio(fwnode, con_id, idx, lookupflags);
  	}
@@ -4185,6 +4189,7 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer,
  					 bool platform_lookup_allowed)
  {
  	unsigned long lookupflags = GPIO_LOOKUP_FLAGS_DEFAULT;
+	const char *name = function_name_or_default(con_id);
  	/*
  	 * scoped_guard() is implemented as a for loop, meaning static
  	 * analyzers will complain about these two not being initialized.
@@ -4207,8 +4212,7 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer,
  		}
if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
-			dev_dbg(consumer, "No GPIO consumer %s found\n",
-				con_id);
+			dev_dbg(consumer, "No GPIO consumer %s found\n", name);
  			return desc;
  		}
@@ -4230,15 +4234,14 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer,
  		 *
  		 * FIXME: Make this more sane and safe.
  		 */
-		dev_info(consumer,
-			 "nonexclusive access to GPIO for %s\n", con_id);
+		dev_info(consumer, "nonexclusive access to GPIO for %s\n", name);
  		return desc;
  	}
ret = gpiod_configure_flags(desc, con_id, lookupflags, flags);
  	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_dbg(consumer, "setup of GPIO %s failed\n", con_id);
  		gpiod_put(desc);
+		dev_dbg(consumer, "setup of GPIO %s failed\n", name);
  		return ERR_PTR(ret);
  	}
@@ -4354,6 +4357,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_optional);
  int gpiod_configure_flags(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *con_id,
  		unsigned long lflags, enum gpiod_flags dflags)
  {
+	const char *name = function_name_or_default(con_id);
  	int ret;
if (lflags & GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW)
@@ -4397,7 +4401,7 @@ int gpiod_configure_flags(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *con_id,
/* No particular flag request, return here... */
  	if (!(dflags & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_SET)) {
-		gpiod_dbg(desc, "no flags found for %s\n", con_id);
+		gpiod_dbg(desc, "no flags found for GPIO %s\n", name);
  		return 0;
  	}

Tested-by: Ferry Toth <ftoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Intel Edison (mrfld)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux