On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:27 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The match function used in gpio_device_find() should not modify the > contents of passed opaque pointer, because such modification would not > be necessary for actual matching and it could lead to quite unreadable, > spaghetti code. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied, thanks! Bart
Re: [PATCH] gpio: constify opaque pointer in gpio_device_find() match function
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: constify opaque pointer in gpio_device_find() match function
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:19:50 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20240208202704.631203-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
- References: <20240208202704.631203-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: constify opaque pointer in gpio_device_find() match function
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [PATCH] gpio: constify opaque pointer in gpio_device_find() match function
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: add EyeQ5 OLB system controller
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: clarify default_values being logical
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: constify opaque pointer in gpio_device_find() match function
- Next by thread: [brgl:gpio/for-next] BUILD SUCCESS aab5c6f200238ac45001bec3d5494fff8438a8dc
- Index(es):
 |