On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 8:24 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:17:14PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 6:39 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 10:59:15AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > ... > > > > > - if (!desc || IS_ERR(desc) || !desc->gdev || !desc->gdev->chip) > > > > + if (!desc || IS_ERR(desc)) > > > > > > IS_ERR_OR_NULL() > > > > Ah, good point. It's a small nit though so I'll fix it when applying > > barring some major objections for the rest. > > > > > > return -EINVAL; > > thinking more about it, shouldn't we return an actual error to the caller which > is in desc? > > if (!desc) > return -EINVAL; > if (IS_ERR(desc)) > return PTR_ERR(desc); > > ? Hmm... maybe but that's out of the scope of this series. Bart > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >