On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:17:14PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 6:39 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 10:59:15AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: ... > > > - if (!desc || IS_ERR(desc) || !desc->gdev || !desc->gdev->chip) > > > + if (!desc || IS_ERR(desc)) > > > > IS_ERR_OR_NULL() > > Ah, good point. It's a small nit though so I'll fix it when applying > barring some major objections for the rest. > > > > return -EINVAL; thinking more about it, shouldn't we return an actual error to the caller which is in desc? if (!desc) return -EINVAL; if (IS_ERR(desc)) return PTR_ERR(desc); ? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko