On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:49 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:45:39AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:28 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > It's useful to have the device type information for those sub-devices > > > that are actually GPIO chips registered with GPIOLIB. While at it: use > > > the device type struct to setup the release callback which is the > > > preferred way to use the device API. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > (...= > > > +static struct device_type gpio_dev_type = { > > Can you make this structure const please? > I have, there's a v2 on the list already. Thanks Bart > > > + .name = "gpio_chip", > > > + .release = gpiodev_release, > > > +}; > > > + gdev->dev.type = &gpio_dev_type; > > > gdev->dev.bus = &gpio_bus_type; > > > gdev->dev.parent = gc->parent; > > > > Looks good to me (TM) but we should run this by Greg so he get the chance > > to chime in, I doubt he will see it on LKML. > > Yes thanks, I wouldn't have caught it... > > greg k-h