On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 5:24 PM Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 9/21/2023 5:00 PM, Wenhua Lin wrote: > > When the soc changes, the corresponding gpio-eic-sprd.c > > code needs to be modified, and the corresponding > > Document must also be modified, which is quite troublesome. > > To avoid modifying the driver file, the number of EICs > > is automatically calculated by matching dts nodes. > > > > Fixes: 2788938b7946 ("gpio: eic-sprd: Make the irqchip immutable") > > This is not a bugfix and you still use an incorrect Fixes tag. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c > > index 96f1c7fd3988..e85addbdf8aa 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c > > @@ -100,33 +100,32 @@ struct sprd_eic { > > > > struct sprd_eic_variant_data { > > enum sprd_eic_type type; > > - u32 num_eics; > > }; > > > > +#define SPRD_EIC_VAR_DATA(soc_name) \ > > +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_dbnc_data = { \ > > + .type = SPRD_EIC_DEBOUNCE, \ > > +}; \ > > + \ > > +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_latch_data = { \ > > + .type = SPRD_EIC_LATCH, \ > > +}; \ > > + \ > > +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_async_data = { \ > > + .type = SPRD_EIC_ASYNC, \ > > +}; \ > > + \ > > +static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data soc_name##_eic_sync_data = { \ > > + .type = SPRD_EIC_SYNC, \ > > +} > > + > > +SPRD_EIC_VAR_DATA(sc9860); > > + > > static const char *sprd_eic_label_name[SPRD_EIC_MAX] = { > > "eic-debounce", "eic-latch", "eic-async", > > "eic-sync", > > }; > > > > -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_dbnc_data = { > > - .type = SPRD_EIC_DEBOUNCE, > > - .num_eics = 8, > > -}; > > - > > -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_latch_data = { > > - .type = SPRD_EIC_LATCH, > > - .num_eics = 8, > > -}; > > - > > -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_async_data = { > > - .type = SPRD_EIC_ASYNC, > > - .num_eics = 8, > > -}; > > - > > -static const struct sprd_eic_variant_data sc9860_eic_sync_data = { > > - .type = SPRD_EIC_SYNC, > > - .num_eics = 8, > > -}; > > > > static inline void __iomem *sprd_eic_offset_base(struct sprd_eic *sprd_eic, > > unsigned int bank) > > @@ -595,6 +594,7 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > struct sprd_eic *sprd_eic; > > struct resource *res; > > int ret, i; > > + u16 num_banks = 0; > > > > pdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > > if (!pdata) { > > @@ -625,12 +625,13 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > break; > > > > sprd_eic->base[i] = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > > + num_banks++; > > Please move this after the validation of the sprd_eic->base. Thank you very much for your review. I will fix this issue in patch v3. > > > if (IS_ERR(sprd_eic->base[i])) > > return PTR_ERR(sprd_eic->base[i]); > > } > > > > sprd_eic->chip.label = sprd_eic_label_name[sprd_eic->type]; > > - sprd_eic->chip.ngpio = pdata->num_eics; > > + sprd_eic->chip.ngpio = num_banks * SPRD_EIC_PER_BANK_NR; > > sprd_eic->chip.base = -1; > > sprd_eic->chip.parent = &pdev->dev; > > sprd_eic->chip.direction_input = sprd_eic_direction_input;