Re: [libgpiod][PATCH] gpioset: reword note on post-exit behaviour

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 4:29 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 09:08:37PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > The note regarding the state of a line after gpioset exits is
> > confusing and unhelpful to the average reader, if not outright
> > incorrect.
> > A common mis-interpretation is that this behaviour is arbitrarily
> > chosen by spiteful implementors. The note also specifies that the line
> > reverts to default, but that is not always the case, or is at least
> > out of the control of gpioset or libgpiod.
> >
> > Reword the note to constrain the scope to that relevant to the
> > likely reader, and to emphasize that the behaviour is inherent
> > in the kernel GPIO interface, not in the gpioset implementation.
> >
>
> Could've sworn I added the [libgpiod] subject prefix, but clearly not.

No worries, applied.

Bart