On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 09:08:37PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > The note regarding the state of a line after gpioset exits is > confusing and unhelpful to the average reader, if not outright > incorrect. > A common mis-interpretation is that this behaviour is arbitrarily > chosen by spiteful implementors. The note also specifies that the line > reverts to default, but that is not always the case, or is at least > out of the control of gpioset or libgpiod. > > Reword the note to constrain the scope to that relevant to the > likely reader, and to emphasize that the behaviour is inherent > in the kernel GPIO interface, not in the gpioset implementation. > Could've sworn I added the [libgpiod] subject prefix, but clearly not.