Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] pinctrl: samsung: support ExynosAuto GPIO structure

[Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 23. 12. 10. 22:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/12/2023 08:45, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>> New ExynosAuto series GPIO have a different register structure.
>> In the existing Exynos series, EINT control register enumerated after
> Missing verb... or enumerated is past tense? I just don't get entire
> sentence.

Sorry, I will add 'is' like below.

In the existing Exynos series, the EINT control register is enumerated 
after a specific offset.


>
>> a specific offset (e.g EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET, EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET).
>> However, from ExynosAutov920 SoC, the register that controls EINT belongs
>> to each GPIO bank, and each GPIO bank has 0x1000 align.
>>
>> This is a structure to protect the GPIO bank using S2MPU in VM environment,
>> and will only be applied in ExynosAuto series SoCs.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> | original		| ExynosAutov920	|
>> |-----------------------------------------------|
>> | 0x0	GPIO_CON	| 0x0	GPIO_CON	|
>> | 0x4	GPIO_DAT	| 0x4	GPIO_DAT	|
>> | 0x8	GPIO_PUD	| 0x8	GPIO_PUD	|
>> | 0xc	GPIO_DRV	| 0xc	GPIO_DRV	|
>> | 0x10	GPIO_CONPDN	| 0x10	GPIO_CONPDN	|
>> | 0x14	GPIO_PUDPDN	| 0x14	GPIO_PUDPDN	|
>> | 0x700	EINT_CON	| 0x18	EINT_CON	|
> This suggests there is EINT_CON per bank in old and new register layout.
> I don't think it's true, so probably this could look like:
>
> | ---                           | 0x18	EINT_CON (per_bank) |
> | ---                           | 0x18	EINT_FLTCON0 (per_bank) |
> | ---                           | 0x18	EINT_FLTCON1 (per_bank) |
> | ---                           | 0x18	EINT_MASK (per_bank) |
> | 0x700	EINT_CON (global)       | 0x18	EINT_CON	|
>
> etc..
>
> Also, please use spaces for alignment in the table.
>
Thanks you for your review.

I will add (global), (per_bank) for clearer expression.

And, I will use space instead of tab in v4.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>