Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] pinctrl: samsung: support ExynosAuto GPIO structure

[Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Krzysztof,

Thanks to review.


On 23. 12. 10. 22:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/12/2023 08:45, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>> New ExynosAuto series GPIO have a different register structure.
>> In the existing Exynos series, EINT control register enumerated after
>> a specific offset (e.g EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET, EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET).
>> However, from ExynosAutov920 SoC, the register that controls EINT belongs
>> to each GPIO bank, and each GPIO bank has 0x1000 align.
>>
>> This is a structure to protect the GPIO bank using S2MPU in VM environment,
>> and will only be applied in ExynosAuto series SoCs.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> | original		| ExynosAutov920	|
>> |-----------------------------------------------|
>> | 0x0	GPIO_CON	| 0x0	GPIO_CON	|
>> | 0x4	GPIO_DAT	| 0x4	GPIO_DAT	|
>> | 0x8	GPIO_PUD	| 0x8	GPIO_PUD	|
>> | 0xc	GPIO_DRV	| 0xc	GPIO_DRV	|
>> | 0x10	GPIO_CONPDN	| 0x10	GPIO_CONPDN	|
>> | 0x14	GPIO_PUDPDN	| 0x14	GPIO_PUDPDN	|
>> | 0x700	EINT_CON	| 0x18	EINT_CON	|
>> | 0x800	EINT_FLTCON	| 0x1c	EINT_FLTCON0	|
>> | 0x900	EINT_MASK	| 0x20	EINT_FLTCON1	|
>> | 0xa00	EINT_PEND	| 0x24	EINT_MASK	|
>> |			| 0x28	EINT_PEND	|
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c  | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h  |  1 +
>>   drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c |  3 +
>>   drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.h | 12 ++++
>>   4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> index 6b58ec84e34b..f798f64b1122 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ static void exynos_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
>>   	unsigned int mask;
>>   	unsigned long flags;
>>   
>> +	if (bank->eint_mask_offset)
>> +		reg_mask = bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_mask_offset;
> Drop the initialization of reg_mask so:
>
> else:
> reg_mask = ...

Okay, I will fix it in v4.


>
>> +
>>   	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>>   
>>   	mask = readl(bank->eint_base + reg_mask);
>> @@ -72,6 +75,9 @@ static void exynos_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
>>   	struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
>>   	unsigned long reg_pend = our_chip->eint_pend + bank->eint_offset;
>>   
>> +	if (bank->eint_pend_offset)
>> +		reg_pend = bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_pend_offset;
>> +
>>   	writel(1 << irqd->hwirq, bank->eint_base + reg_pend);
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -95,6 +101,9 @@ static void exynos_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
>>   	if (irqd_get_trigger_type(irqd) & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK)
>>   		exynos_irq_ack(irqd);
>>   
> Ditto
I will fix it also.
>
>> +	if (bank->eint_mask_offset)
>> +		reg_mask = bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_mask_offset;
>> +
>>   	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>>   
>>   	mask = readl(bank->eint_base + reg_mask);
>> @@ -139,6 +148,9 @@ static int exynos_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *irqd, unsigned int type)
>>   	else
>>   		irq_set_handler_locked(irqd, handle_level_irq);
>>   
>
> Ditto
I will fix it also.
>
>> +	if (bank->eint_con_offset)
>> +		reg_con = bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_con_offset;
>> +
>>   	con = readl(bank->eint_base + reg_con);
>>   	con &= ~(EXYNOS_EINT_CON_MASK << shift);
>>   	con |= trig_type << shift;
>> @@ -221,6 +233,18 @@ static const struct exynos_irq_chip exynos_gpio_irq_chip __initconst = {
>>   	/* eint_wake_mask_value not used */
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const struct exynos_irq_chip exynosauto_gpio_irq_chip __initconst = {
> No related to this patch.
>
>> +	.chip = {
>> +		.name = "exynosauto_gpio_irq_chip",
>> +		.irq_unmask = exynos_irq_unmask,
>> +		.irq_mask = exynos_irq_mask,
>> +		.irq_ack = exynos_irq_ack,
>> +		.irq_set_type = exynos_irq_set_type,
>> +		.irq_request_resources = exynos_irq_request_resources,
>> +		.irq_release_resources = exynos_irq_release_resources,
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>>   static int exynos_eint_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
>>   					irq_hw_number_t hw)
>>   {
>> @@ -247,7 +271,10 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_eint_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
>>   	unsigned int svc, group, pin;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>> -	svc = readl(bank->eint_base + EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET);
>> +	if (bank->eint_con_offset)
>> +		svc = readl(bank->eint_base + EXYNOSAUTO_SVC_OFFSET);
> This belongs to the second patch. The point of this patch is only to
> customize the offsets. There should be nothing autov920 here.

Okay, I will put the irq-related changes in the v920 patch.


>
>
>> +	else
>> +		svc = readl(bank->eint_base + EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET);
>>   	group = EXYNOS_SVC_GROUP(svc);
>>   	pin = svc & EXYNOS_SVC_NUM_MASK;
>>   
>> @@ -297,8 +324,12 @@ __init int exynos_eint_gpio_init(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d)
>>   		if (bank->eint_type != EINT_TYPE_GPIO)
>>   			continue;
>>   
>> -		bank->irq_chip = devm_kmemdup(dev, &exynos_gpio_irq_chip,
>> -					   sizeof(*bank->irq_chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (bank->eint_con_offset)
>> +			bank->irq_chip = devm_kmemdup(dev, &exynosauto_gpio_irq_chip,
>> +						      sizeof(*bank->irq_chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		else
>> +			bank->irq_chip = devm_kmemdup(dev, &exynos_gpio_irq_chip,
>> +						      sizeof(*bank->irq_chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>>   		if (!bank->irq_chip) {
>>   			ret = -ENOMEM;
>>   			goto err_domains;
>> @@ -655,6 +686,19 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_suspend_bank(
>>   	pr_debug("%s: save    mask %#010x\n", bank->name, save->eint_mask);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void exynosauto_pinctrl_suspend_bank(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata,
>> +					    struct samsung_pin_bank *bank)
>> +{
>> +	struct exynos_eint_gpio_save *save = bank->soc_priv;
>> +	void __iomem *regs = bank->eint_base;
>> +
>> +	save->eint_con = readl(regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_con_offset);
>> +	save->eint_mask = readl(regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_mask_offset);
>> +
>> +	pr_debug("%s: save     con %#010x\n", bank->name, save->eint_con);
>> +	pr_debug("%s: save    mask %#010x\n", bank->name, save->eint_mask);
>> +}
>> +
>>   void exynos_pinctrl_suspend(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata)
>>   {
>>   	struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = drvdata->pin_banks;
>> @@ -662,8 +706,12 @@ void exynos_pinctrl_suspend(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata)
>>   	int i;
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank) {
>> -		if (bank->eint_type == EINT_TYPE_GPIO)
>> -			exynos_pinctrl_suspend_bank(drvdata, bank);
>> +		if (bank->eint_type == EINT_TYPE_GPIO) {
>> +			if (bank->eint_con_offset)
>> +				exynosauto_pinctrl_suspend_bank(drvdata, bank);
>> +			else
>> +				exynos_pinctrl_suspend_bank(drvdata, bank);
>> +		}
>>   		else if (bank->eint_type == EINT_TYPE_WKUP) {
>>   			if (!irq_chip) {
>>   				irq_chip = bank->irq_chip;
>> @@ -704,14 +752,33 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_resume_bank(
>>   						+ bank->eint_offset);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void exynosauto_pinctrl_resume_bank(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata,
>> +					   struct samsung_pin_bank *bank)
>> +{
>> +	struct exynos_eint_gpio_save *save = bank->soc_priv;
>> +	void __iomem *regs = bank->eint_base;
>> +
>> +	pr_debug("%s:     con %#010x => %#010x\n", bank->name,
>> +		 readl(regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_con_offset), save->eint_con);
>> +	pr_debug("%s:    mask %#010x => %#010x\n", bank->name,
>> +		 readl(regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_mask_offset), save->eint_mask);
>> +
>> +	writel(save->eint_con, regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_con_offset);
>> +	writel(save->eint_mask, regs + bank->pctl_offset + bank->eint_mask_offset);
>> +}
>> +
>>   void exynos_pinctrl_resume(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata)
>>   {
>>   	struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = drvdata->pin_banks;
>>   	int i;
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < drvdata->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank)
>> -		if (bank->eint_type == EINT_TYPE_GPIO)
>> -			exynos_pinctrl_resume_bank(drvdata, bank);
>> +		if (bank->eint_type == EINT_TYPE_GPIO) {
>> +			if (bank->eint_con_offset)
>> +				exynosauto_pinctrl_resume_bank(drvdata, bank);
>> +			else
>> +				exynos_pinctrl_resume_bank(drvdata, bank);
>> +		}
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void exynos_retention_enable(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata)
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h
>> index 3ac52c2cf998..5049c170e958 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>>   #define EXYNOS7_WKUP_EMASK_OFFSET	0x900
>>   #define EXYNOS7_WKUP_EPEND_OFFSET	0xA00
>>   #define EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET		0xB08
>> +#define EXYNOSAUTO_SVC_OFFSET		0xF008
> As well not related to this patch.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>

Thanks

Jaewon Kim