On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:27 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > gpiochip_is_requested() not only has a misleading name but it returns > > a pointer to a string that is freed when the descriptor is released. > > > > Provide a new helper meant to replace it, which returns a copy of the > > label string instead. > > ... > > > + * Must not be called from atomic context. > > Put the respective lockdep annotation. > What are you referring to? Bart > ... > > > + char *cpy; > > So, why not naming it fully, i.e. "copy"? > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >