On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 7:00 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:48:06PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:27 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > ... > > > > > + char *cpy; > > > > > > So, why not naming it fully, i.e. "copy"? > > > > > > > Ekhm... let me quote the BigPinguin :) > > > > -- > > > > C is a Spartan language, and your naming conventions should follow suit. > > Unlike Modula-2 and Pascal programmers, C programmers do not use cute > > names like ThisVariableIsATemporaryCounter. A C programmer would call that > > variable ``tmp``, which is much easier to write, and not the least more > > difficult to understand. > > In contrary the cpy is more difficult to understand. > > `git grep -lw cpy` vs. `git grep -lw copy` suggests that my variant > is preferable (even excluding tools/ and Documentation/). > You are a thorough reviewer but man, are you also a bikeshedder. :) Whatever, let's make it 'copy'. Bart > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >