On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 04:24:01PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using > EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro, so that the compiler can > discard it in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n. Obviously correct fix, I've pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:04:18 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- From: Raag Jadav
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: lynxpoint: Simplify code with cleanup helpers
- Next by Date: [brgl:gpio/for-next] BUILD SUCCESS d652049e118ffe9227155f7b9b85faf15fc91f8f
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- Next by thread: [PATCH v4 1/1] pinctrl: mediatek: Switch to use no-IRQ PM helpers
- Index(es):
 |