On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 04:24:01PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using
> EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro, so that the compiler can
> discard it in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.
>
> Fixes: b10a74b5c0c1 ("pinctrl: intel: Provide Intel pin control wide PM ops structure")
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:52:54 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- References: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- From: Raag Jadav
- [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 04/39] pinctrl: add a Cirrus ep93xx SoC pin controller
- Next by Date: [PATCH v4 1/1] pinctrl: mediatek: Switch to use no-IRQ PM helpers
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro
- Index(es):
 |