Re: [PATCH v3 54/73] pinctrl: intel: drop the wrappers around pinctrl_gpio_direction_input()

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 3:16 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 02:55:07PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 2:46 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 02:44:25PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 14:41, Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pinctrl_gpio_direction_input() now has the same signature as the
> > > > > > wrappers around it so we can drop them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, for the sake of symmetry can you add (at least to the all
> > > > > Intel drivers you modified in this series) the following:
> > > >
> > > > Good idea but this is v6.8 material, I don't want to extend this
> > > > series anymore at this point.
> > >
> > > Then let's postpone at least Intel and Cypress patches after v6.8-rc1 is out.
> >
> > But then we'd have to postpone the renaming and we'd be stuck with
> > both variants in the tree. This is suboptimal. We'd also have this
> > huge series spanning two subsystems for 3 months during the v6.8
> > release cycle in the tree causing conflicts and other issues.
>
> I don't see how this is related. What I'm talking is only related to dropping
> the wrappers in the drivers _after_ whatever you do with generic APIs.

Ah, I misunderstood you. Ok, I'll drop them from the tree.

Bart