Re: [libgpiod][PATCH 2/3] bindings: rust: allow cloning line::Info -> line::OwnedInfo

["Erik Schilling" <erik.schilling@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri Sep 29, 2023 at 12:50 PM CEST, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> $subject: s/OwnedInfo/InfoOwned/

Whoops. Flipped that around at some point. Forgot to fix here... Will do
once we agreed on a naming scheme :)

>
> On 28-09-23, 14:52, Erik Schilling wrote:
> > On Wed Sep 27, 2023 at 6:29 PM CEST, Erik Schilling wrote:
> > > diff --git a/bindings/rust/libgpiod/src/line_info.rs b/bindings/rust/libgpiod/src/line_info.rs
> > > index 32c4bb2..fe01a14 100644
> > > --- a/bindings/rust/libgpiod/src/line_info.rs
> > > +++ b/bindings/rust/libgpiod/src/line_info.rs
> > > @@ -58,6 +58,22 @@ impl Info {
> > >          self as *const _ as *mut _
> > >      }
> > >  
> > > +    /// Clones the [gpiod::gpiod_line_info] instance to an [InfoOwned]
> > > +    pub fn try_clone(&self) -> Result<InfoOwned> {
> > 
> > Hm... I realized that we have `event_clone()` for cloning an `Event`
> > and `settings_clone()` for cloning `line::Settings`. Should better
> > stay consistent here...
> > 
> > However, I think the name `try_clone()` sounds more suitable to me. Any
> > opinions? I could send a patch to rename the existing cloning methods
> > to `try_clone()`.
>
> IIRC, I did try to use clone() and try_clone() earlier for something and there
> were prototype issues, as they weren't matching with the standard library and so
> had to innovate `event_clone()` and `settings_clone()`. `try_clone()` is anyday
> better.

ACK. I am not aware of any trait like `TryClone`, but yeah: `Clone` and
`ToOwned` do not work for the reason outlined in the commit message.

I will then add a commit to rename the other `*_clone` functions to
`try_clone` in v2.

- Erik