Re: [RFT PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: move the GPIO quirk to gpiolib-of.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Le mardi 26 septembre 2023 à 11:16 +0200, Miquel Raynal a écrit :
> Hi Bartosz,
> 
> brgl@xxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:06:23 +0200:
> 
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > We have a special place for OF polarity quirks in gpiolib-of.c.
> > Let's
> > move this over there so that it doesn't pollute the driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This is an alternative to the previous patch that instead of
> > replacing
> > one active-low setter with another, just moves the quirk over to
> > gpiolib-of.c
> > 
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c                       |  9 +++++++++
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c | 12 ------------
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> > index 5515f32cf19b..58c0bbe9d569 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> > @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ static void of_gpio_try_fixup_polarity(const
> > struct device_node *np,
> >                  */
> >                 { "himax,hx8357",       "gpios-reset",  false },
> >                 { "himax,hx8369",       "gpios-reset",  false },
> > +               /*
> > +                * The rb-gpios semantics was undocumented and
> > qi,lb60 (along with
> > +                * the ingenic driver) got it wrong. The active
> > state encodes the
> > +                * NAND ready state, which is high level. Since
> > there's no signal
> > +                * inverter on this board, it should be active-
> > high. Let's fix that
> > +                * here for older DTs so we can re-use the generic
> > nand_gpio_waitrdy()
> > +                * helper, and be consistent with what other
> > drivers do.
> > +                */
> > +               { "qi,lb60",            "rb-gpios",     true },
> 
> I didn't know about such a list, interesting. Better be aware when
> debugging :)
> 
> IIRC Linus was fine, so if Paul also agrees I guess this is better
> taking through the gpio tree? I don't have any ingenic related
> changes
> queued right now so feel free to take it.

Works for me.

> 
> Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Thanks,
> Miquèl

Cheers,
-Paul




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux