Hi Bartosz, brgl@xxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:06:23 +0200: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We have a special place for OF polarity quirks in gpiolib-of.c. Let's > move this over there so that it doesn't pollute the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > This is an alternative to the previous patch that instead of replacing > one active-low setter with another, just moves the quirk over to > gpiolib-of.c > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 9 +++++++++ > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c | 12 ------------ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > index 5515f32cf19b..58c0bbe9d569 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ static void of_gpio_try_fixup_polarity(const struct device_node *np, > */ > { "himax,hx8357", "gpios-reset", false }, > { "himax,hx8369", "gpios-reset", false }, > + /* > + * The rb-gpios semantics was undocumented and qi,lb60 (along with > + * the ingenic driver) got it wrong. The active state encodes the > + * NAND ready state, which is high level. Since there's no signal > + * inverter on this board, it should be active-high. Let's fix that > + * here for older DTs so we can re-use the generic nand_gpio_waitrdy() > + * helper, and be consistent with what other drivers do. > + */ > + { "qi,lb60", "rb-gpios", true }, I didn't know about such a list, interesting. Better be aware when debugging :) IIRC Linus was fine, so if Paul also agrees I guess this is better taking through the gpio tree? I don't have any ingenic related changes queued right now so feel free to take it. Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Miquèl