On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 4:55 AM <xingtong_wu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: "xingtong.wu" <xingtong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > switch pin base from static to automatic allocation to > avoid conflicts and align with other gpio chip drivers > > Signed-off-by: xingtong.wu <xingtong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied, thanks! Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio-f7188x: fix base values conflicts with other gpio pins
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio-f7188x: fix base values conflicts with other gpio pins
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:04:31 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20230529025011.2806-2-xingtong_wu@163.com>
- References: <20230529025011.2806-1-xingtong_wu@163.com> <20230529025011.2806-2-xingtong_wu@163.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio-f7188x: fix base values conflicts with other gpio pins
- From: xingtong_wu
- [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio-f7188x: fix base values conflicts with other gpio pins
- From: xingtong_wu
- [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio-f7188x: fix base values conflicts with other gpio pins
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: da9062: don't pull in internal GPIOLIB headers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio-f7188x: fix base values conflicts with other gpio pins
- Next by thread: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue
- Index(es):
 |