On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > New code should solely use firmware nodes for the specifics and > not any callbacks. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Series applied, thanks! Bart
Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:01:21 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20230901134041.1165562-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20230901134041.1165562-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 11/17] qcom_minidump: Register ramoops region with minidump
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio-f7188x: fix base values conflicts with other gpio pins
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data
- Index(es):
 |