Hi Claudiu, Thank you for the review. On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:12 AM claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, Prabhakar, > > On 9/5/23 15:56, Prabhakar wrote: > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Validate the GPIO pin request in rzg2l_gpio_request() callback using > > rzg2l_validate_gpio_pin() function. This stops any accidental usage > > of GPIO pins which are not supported by the SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > index 37cdfe4b04f9..4ad08a4b786a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > @@ -795,12 +795,18 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops rzg2l_pinctrl_confops = { > > static int rzg2l_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) > > { > > struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > > + const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pin = &pctrl->desc.pins[offset]; > > + u64 *pin_data = pin->drv_data; > > Maybe move this down a bit to keep the reverse christmas tree order that > the driver is using as pattern. > Sure, will do and send a v2. > Other than this: > Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks for testing. Cheers, Prabhakar