On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:05 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 9:40 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kent: > > > If the plan is to change the kernel such that it will no longer unload > > > modules with bound devices then the patch totally makes sense. > > > > Linus has not commented on that yet > > [Fear Of Missing Out intensifies] > > Is this some mail thread I should look at but didn't? > I was talking about this one: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230818190108.22031-1-brgl@xxxxxxxx/T/ Bart > Or do you refer to Torvalds? > > > and there's a thing I need to > > check first (hopefully today) but I think it will make more sense. > > This patch on the other hand is not incorrect even if the behavior > > doesn't change. I will queue it. > > This patch is doing the right thing from a module management point > of view for sure. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij