On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:27 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:11:18AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:08 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:55:44AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > We currently only emit CHANGED_CONFIG events when the user-space changes > > > > GPIO config. We won't be notified if changes come from in-kernel. Let's > > > > call the notifier chain whenever kernel users change direction or any of > > > > the active-low, debounce or consumer name settings. We don't notify the > > > > user-space about the persistence as the uAPI has no notion of it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > v1 -> v2: > > > > - use the gpiod_line_state_notify() helper > > > > - reorder the code in gpiod_set_debounce() for better readability > > > > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > index 40a0022ea719..1cb7731550ca 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > @@ -2439,6 +2439,7 @@ int gpiod_direction_input(struct gpio_desc *desc) > > > > } > > > > if (ret == 0) { > > > > clear_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags); > > > > + gpiod_line_state_notify(desc, GPIO_V2_LINE_CHANGED_CONFIG); > > > > ret = gpio_set_bias(desc); > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > gpiod_direction_input() is called by cdev when a line is requested. > > > So requesting a line now creates two events - REQUESTED and > > > HANGED_CONFIG? Even worse - it calls gpiod_direction_input() first, so we > > > will get CHANGED_CONFIG then REQUESTED?? > > > > > > And a config change from cdev can call this and then generate a > > > CHANGED_CONFIG event itself, so again double events. > > > > > > Same for output and probably debounce too (that one is a bit more > > > convoluted). > > > > Ah, should have tested it with user-space too... > > > > Back to the drawing board I guess. May be the reason why we're not > > doing it in the first place yet. > > > > I think we were only looking at it from the userspace PoV, so what > constitutes a "change" is only well defined when driven from userspace. > This might be difficult to generalise without redefining what > "changed" means, or providing cdev with a separate gpiolib API so you > can tell whether the change is actually part of a cdev request, or ... > > So, yeah - more thought required. > > Got a use case that requires this, or just a nice to have? > I'm extending the virtual consumer driver and wanted to test from user-spaces things like changing direction and other settings. I figured it would make more sense to notify about all changes no matter the source. Bart