On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:06 PM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 12:51:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 9:58 AM Uwe Kleine-König > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc4/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c#L1262 > > Ah, that was the necessary hint. Adding the aliases there would be a > third patch in this series, right? No. Just split out that one to gpiolib main code, since it's already using fwnode API, update OF code to use it, and modify it and then we are done. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:21:48 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20230531100655.dedu3udhd4dv7r7j@pengutronix.de>
- References: <20230530151946.2317748-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20230530151946.2317748-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <CAHp75VegyUL6J-s4W4fHhKu4cNeBA=4J4CmDHmtAfCUr9qGHQg@mail.gmail.com> <20230531065829.7qrkv2ivs57aymcz@pengutronix.de> <CAHp75VeNTuQWLqieSyh0djyrBApoZRwKOAnMRd80fVGzfJAnbw@mail.gmail.com> <20230531100655.dedu3udhd4dv7r7j@pengutronix.de>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: introduce hog properties with less ambiguity
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- From: Uwe Kleine-König
- [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: introduce hog properties with less ambiguity
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpio: Add gpio-delay support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs
- Index(es):
 |