[PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: introduce hog properties with less ambiguity

[Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

this is another approach after
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20210503210526.43455-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
two years ago. I switched back to "active" and "inactive" from
"asserted" and "deasserted". The poll about the naming is ambigous, but
I think with a slight preference of active/inactive over
asserted/deasserted (with my unbiased self preferring active/inactive,
too :-)

Rob Herring acked patch #1 and Linus Walleij acked patch #2 of the
asserted/deasserted variant back then, I dropped these as the change is
too relevant IMHO.

In the previous post I had some inconsistencies that should be gone now.

And Andy wrote:
> I like the idea (with active-inactive terms), but...
> 
> It’s a half baked solution. Please use fwnode to cover all possible
> providers.

which I didn't address because I want to change what is currently
supported and not introduce new support. Adding fwnode is orthogonal to
this renaming. I didn't find any other more general implementation that
would affect more than "of" for output-high and output-low. Please tell me
if I missed something.

Best regards
Uwe

Uwe Kleine-König (2):
  dt-bindings: gpio: introduce hog properties with less ambiguity
  gpio: use "active" and "inactive" instead of "high" and "low" for output hogs

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 16 +++++++++++-----
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c                       | 10 ++++++++--
 include/linux/gpio/consumer.h                   | 14 ++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)


base-commit: 8c33787278ca8db73ad7d23f932c8c39b9f6e543
-- 
2.39.2