Re: [PATCH] drivers/gpio : Remove redundant clearing of IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:17 PM Lizhe <sensor1010@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Before executing microchip_sgpio_irq_set_type(),
> type has already been cleared IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK, see __irq_set_trigger().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c | 1 -
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c  | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c
> index 595e9cb33c1d..863fa497b1a2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,6 @@ static int gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> -       type &= IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
>         if (type == IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> index a68f682aec01..34fd007b0308 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> @@ -505,7 +505,6 @@ static int mvebu_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>         if ((u & BIT(pin)) == 0)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       type &= IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
>         if (type == IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Please split it into two patches. I can apply the second part but
arch/arm is beyond my jurisdiction.

While at it: is this platform even used at all? If so, then maybe we
could migrate this driver to drivers/gpio/?

Bart




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux