On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:22 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would like to route this via Intel pin control tree with issuing > an immutable branch for both PINCTRL and PWM subsystems, but I'm > open for other suggestions. I'm fine with this approach if it works for Uwe. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:01:56 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20221108142226.63161-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20221108142226.63161-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v2 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,msm8976: convert to dtschema
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: add NXP S32 SoC family support
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] pwm: Add a stub for devm_pwmchip_add()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
- Index(es):
 |