On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:42 PM Yuan Can <yuancan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> After commit 0e3db16300fb("pinctrl: bcm: Convert drivers to use struct pingroup
> and PINCTRL_PINGROUP()"), no one use struct bcm6328_pingroup, so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuancan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Patch applied!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: bcm: Remove unused struct bcm6328_pingroup
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: bcm: Remove unused struct bcm6328_pingroup
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:39:45 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20220927133926.103943-1-yuancan@huawei.com>
- References: <20220927133926.103943-1-yuancan@huawei.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: bcm: Remove unused struct bcm6328_pingroup
- From: Yuan Can
- [PATCH] pinctrl: bcm: Remove unused struct bcm6328_pingroup
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] pinctrl: wpcm450: Correct the fwnode_irq_get() return value check
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: bcm: Remove unused struct bcm6328_pingroup
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 00/12] pinctrl/arm64: qcom: continued - fix Qualcomm LPASS pinctrl schema warnings
- Index(es):
 |