> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 10:11 AM > To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@xxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; brgl@xxxxxxxx; > shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add imx scu gpio driver > bindings > > Caution: EXT Email > > On 11/08/2022 17:52, Shenwei Wang wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 9:36 AM > >> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@xxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > >> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; > >> brgl@xxxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx > >> <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> > >> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > >> gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add imx scu gpio > >> driver bindings > >>> diff --git > >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,imx-sc-gpio.yaml > >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,imx-sc-gpio.yaml > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 000000000000..a1b024cddc97 > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,imx-sc-gpio.yaml > >>> +description: | > >>> + This module provides the standard interface to control the > >>> + resource pins in SCU domain on i.MX8 platforms. > >>> + > >>> +properties: > >>> + compatible: > >>> + enum: > >>> + - fsl,imx8qxp-sc-gpio > >> > >> Now the filename does not match compatible. Use the same compatible > >> as filename. > > > > The subnodes under fsl,scu.yaml have their own naming rule. For > > example, the watchdog compatible is "fsl,imx-sc-wdt", but the file name is > "fsl,scu-wdt.yaml". > > The other files have for example fsl,imx-sc-wdt, so they match compatible. I don't see the file fsl,imx-sc-wdt you mentioned under the watchdog directory. $ ls fsl* fsl-imx7ulp-wdt.yaml fsl-imx-wdt.yaml fsl,scu-wdt.yaml Regards, Shenwei > > > Is the filename required > > to match its compatible? > > Yes, that's the convention. Otherwise people tend to name the files in whatever > way they like... > > Best regards, > Krzysztof