On 11/08/2022 17:52, Shenwei Wang wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 9:36 AM >> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@xxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; >> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; brgl@xxxxxxxx; >> shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >> gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add imx scu gpio driver >> bindings >>> diff --git >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,imx-sc-gpio.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,imx-sc-gpio.yaml >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..a1b024cddc97 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,imx-sc-gpio.yaml >>> +description: | >>> + This module provides the standard interface to control the >>> + resource pins in SCU domain on i.MX8 platforms. >>> + >>> +properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + enum: >>> + - fsl,imx8qxp-sc-gpio >> >> Now the filename does not match compatible. Use the same compatible as >> filename. > > The subnodes under fsl,scu.yaml have their own naming rule. For example, the watchdog > compatible is "fsl,imx-sc-wdt", but the file name is "fsl,scu-wdt.yaml". The other files have for example fsl,imx-sc-wdt, so they match compatible. > Is the filename required > to match its compatible? Yes, that's the convention. Otherwise people tend to name the files in whatever way they like... Best regards, Krzysztof