Hi Andy,
On 6/17/22 18:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 7:20 AM Srinivas Neeli
<srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In five different instances the return value of "of_property_read_u32"
API was neither captured nor checked.
Fixed it by capturing the return value and then checking for any error.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Addresses-Coverity: "check_return"
I think the best course of action here is to go and fix Coverity while
marking these as false positives.
To the idea of castings -- this is not good style and (many?)
maintainers in kernel do not accept such "workaround" for fixing
broken tool.
Let's wait for Linus what he will say about it.
I can't see nothing wrong about declaring that I am intentionally ignoring
return code.
Thanks,
Michal
