On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:05:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:19 AM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:46:06AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 08:08:17AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 07:38:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > +static const struct irq_chip intel_gpio_irq_chip = { > > > > > + .name = "intel-gpio", > > > > > + .irq_ack = intel_gpio_irq_ack, > > > > > + .irq_mask = intel_gpio_irq_mask, > > > > > + .irq_unmask = intel_gpio_irq_unmask, > > > > > + .irq_set_type = intel_gpio_irq_type, > > > > > + .irq_set_wake = intel_gpio_irq_wake, > > > > > + .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, > > > > > + GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, > > > > > +}; > > > > > > > > You still have the inconsistent alignment here. > > > > > > I'm not sure what problem do you see. > > > > I mean the tab alignment you use: > > > > .name = "intel-gpio", > > .irq_ack = intel_gpio_irq_ack, > > .irq_mask = intel_gpio_irq_mask, > > .irq_unmask = intel_gpio_irq_unmask, > > .irq_set_type = intel_gpio_irq_type, > > .irq_set_wake = intel_gpio_irq_wake, > > > > All the other struct initializations in the driver use this style (and I > > prefer it too): > > > > .name = "intel-gpio", > > .irq_ack = intel_gpio_irq_ack, > > .irq_mask = intel_gpio_irq_mask, > > .irq_unmask = intel_gpio_irq_unmask, > > .irq_set_type = intel_gpio_irq_type, > > .irq_set_wake = intel_gpio_irq_wake, > > > > Hope this explains. > > Yes, thanks! > > Okay, can you give your conditional Ack if there are no other > comments? I will fix it locally. Sure. There was typo also in the second patch $subject, please fix it too while you apply them. For both, Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>