On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 7:39 PM Benjamin Stürz <benni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This replaces comments with C99's designated > initializers because the kernel supports them now. Does it follow the conventions which are accepted in the ACPI CA project? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 22:59:54 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20220326165909.506926-5-benni@stuerz.xyz>
- References: <20220326165909.506926-1-benni@stuerz.xyz> <20220326165909.506926-5-benni@stuerz.xyz>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- RE: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- From: Moore, Robert
- Re: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- References:
- [PATCH 01/22] orion5x: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- From: Benjamin Stürz
- [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- From: Benjamin Stürz
- [PATCH 01/22] orion5x: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] pinctrl: armada-37xx: Replace custom code by gpiochip_count() call
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: Allow setting gpio device id via device tree alias
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- Next by thread: RE: [PATCH 05/22] acpica: Replace comments with C99 initializers
- Index(es):
 |