Re: [PATCH 10/10] pinctrl: starfive: Switch to dynamic chip name output

[Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

[resending, as I managed to royally screw up my initial email]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:14:19 +0000,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 14:50, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:44:12 +0000,
> > Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Gotcha. The SoC has been out in very few numbers for less than a year
> > > and the driver only entered mainline in 5.17-rc1, so I doubt anyone
> > > has had time to write scripts that check for this, but I'll let it be
> > > up to you.
> >
> > Ah, I should have checked that. In which case, would you be OK if I
> > simply pushed the removal of this label as a fix for 5.17, and just
> > have it to say "Star5 GPIO", for example, without any indication of
> > the device (which appears in debugfs anyway as part of the irqdomain)?
> 
> I'm fine with it although I'd prefer "StarFive GPIO". I haven't seen
> star5 used anywhere.

Fair enough.

> But shouldn't changes like this normally go through Linus Walleij's
> tree?

Either way, I don't mind. For the record, see below what I'm
suggesting we take in before 5.17-final.

Linus?

Thanks,

	M.