On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:14:19 +0000, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 14:50, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:44:12 +0000, > > Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Gotcha. The SoC has been out in very few numbers for less than a year > > > and the driver only entered mainline in 5.17-rc1, so I doubt anyone > > > has had time to write scripts that check for this, but I'll let it be > > > up to you. > > > > Ah, I should have checked that. In which case, would you be OK if I > > simply pushed the removal of this label as a fix for 5.17, and just > > have it to say "Star5 GPIO", for example, without any indication of > > the device (which appears in debugfs anyway as part of the irqdomain)? > > I'm fine with it although I'd prefer "StarFive GPIO". I haven't seen > star5 used anywhere. Fair enough. > But shouldn't changes like this normally go through Linus Walleij's > tree? Either way, I don't mind. For the record, see below what I'm suggesting we take in before 5.17-final. Linus? Thanks, M.