Re: [PATCH] gpio: aggregator: Fix calling into sleeping GPIO controllers

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:59 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:35 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:09 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +       return chip->can_sleep ? gpiod_get_value_cansleep(fwd->descs[offset])
> > > > +                              : gpiod_get_value(fwd->descs[offset]);
> > >
> > > This indentation kills the perfectionist in me :-)
> >
> > Why? The above is aligned perfectly ("?" just above ":")?
> >
> > > What about:
> > >
> > >        return chip->can_sleep ?
> > >                gpiod_get_value_cansleep(fwd->descs[offset]) :
> > > gpiod_get_value(fwd->descs[offset]);
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Or as variant
> > >
> > >        struct gpio_desc *desc = fwd->descs[offset];
> > >
> > >        return chip->can_sleep ? gpiod_get_value_cansleep(desc) :
> > > gpiod_get_value(desc);
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > IMHO, those are ugly as hell ;-)
>
> I have the same opinion about your initial variant. :-)
>
> So, up to the maintainer(s) what to do.
>

It's Geert's code so let's keep his version. I like it better myself too.

Queued for fixes.

Bart