On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:15:46AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 10:26 AM Richard Hsu <saraon640529@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Thanks, Bart, for pointing out to this. > > #define PT_TOTAL_GPIO 8 > > +#define PT_TOTAL_GPIO_EX 24 ... > > + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev; > > + acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev); > > - if (!ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) { > > + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)) { What you are doing here is open coding the ACPI_COMPANION(). But see below. ... > > + if (!strncmp(acpi_dev_name(acpi_dev), "AMDIF031", 8)) > > + pt_gpio->gc.ngpio = PT_TOTAL_GPIO_EX; > > + else > > + pt_gpio->gc.ngpio = PT_TOTAL_GPIO; Instead of doing this... > > static const struct acpi_device_id pt_gpio_acpi_match[] = { > > { "AMDF030", 0 }, > > { "AMDIF030", 0 }, > > + { "AMDIF031", 0 }, Just use .driver_data here and if needed in the other ID tables and then simply retrieve it (w/o any conditions) in the code above: pt_gpio->gc.ngpio = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(dev); > > { }, > > }; > Please Cc Andy next time on any GPIO stuff related to ACPI. I'll let > him comment on the code. Your commit message must be more descriptive > - the title should say "gpio: <driver name>: <do this and that>". > Please also add a commit message explaining what the code does in > detail. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko