Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add SDX65 pinctrl bindings

[Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 01:07:16AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:01 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:39:45PM -0800, quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Add device tree binding Documentation details for Qualcomm SDX65
> > > pinctrl driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.yaml  | 195 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 195 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.yaml
> >
> > This fails dt_binding_check:
> >
> > /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.example.dt.yaml: pinctrl@f100000: 'serial-pins', 'uart-w-subnodes-state' do not match any of the regexes: '$-state', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> >         From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.yaml
> >
> > The DT list was not Cc'ed so checks never ran nor was this reviewed.
> 
> OK that's annoying, I didn't notice it wasn't posted to the DT list.
> I reverted the patch, Vamsi can you please reiterate the patch
> and include devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on subsequent postings.
> I have kept the kernel code in place, optimistically assuming the
> bindings will be fixed soon-ish.

I'm sorry for overlooking this. I will fix this and post a new patch soon.

Thanks,
Vamsi
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij