Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: Add SDX65 pinctrl bindings

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:01 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:39:45PM -0800, quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add device tree binding Documentation details for Qualcomm SDX65
> > pinctrl driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.yaml  | 195 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 195 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.yaml
>
> This fails dt_binding_check:
>
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.example.dt.yaml: pinctrl@f100000: 'serial-pins', 'uart-w-subnodes-state' do not match any of the regexes: '$-state', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>         From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdx65-pinctrl.yaml
>
> The DT list was not Cc'ed so checks never ran nor was this reviewed.

OK that's annoying, I didn't notice it wasn't posted to the DT list.
I reverted the patch, Vamsi can you please reiterate the patch
and include devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on subsequent postings.
I have kept the kernel code in place, optimistically assuming the
bindings will be fixed soon-ish.

Yours,
Linus Walleij