[Public] > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:13 PM Mario Limonciello > <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The commit ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add > acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()") > > added new functions for drivers to use during the s2idle wakeup path, but > > didn't add stubs for when CONFIG_ACPI wasn't set. > > > > Add those stubs in for other drivers to be able to use. > > > > Fixes: ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()") > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> > > I need an ACK from an ACPI maintainer to take this with the > other fix into the pinctrl tree. > > Alternatively both can be merged into the ACPI tree. > > Should these two patches be tagged for stable? > Yes; I think they should be tagged to stable, but only if these come too: acd47b9f28e55b505aedb842131b40904e151d7c 7e6f8d6f4a42ef9b693ff1b49267c546931d4619