Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] reset: starfive-jh7100: Add StarFive JH7100 reset driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 05:36:21PM +0200, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 17:25, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 5:56 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 16:50, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 5:25 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > > > AFAICS they are sequential 4 32-bit registers.
> > >
> > > That's right, but we're on a 64bit machine, so DECLARE_BITMAP will
> > > give us an unsigned long array that doesn't match that.
> >
> > I didn't get it, sorry.
> > You will have a bitmap array which you will split to 32-bit values.
> > What you will probably need is to move  xgpio_get_value32() and void
> > xgpio_set_value32() to the one of bitmap related headers (look for
> > bitmap_get_value8() and friends).
> >
> > > > So bitmap is exactly what is suitable here, you are right!
> > > > See gpio-xilinx and gpio-pca953x on how to use bitmaps in the GPIO drivers.
> > >
> > > None of them has a pre-initialized const DECLARE_BITMAP, so they don't
> > > have to deal with the 4 vs. 2 commas problem.
> >
> > I believe it's well possible to refactor this to look much better with
> > bitmaps (as it represents the hardware very well).
> 
> Right, but how exactly? This works on on 64bit, but not with 32bit COMPILE_TEST:
> 
> static const DECLARE_BITMAP(jh7100_reset_asserted, JH7100_RSTN_END) = {
>         /* STATUS0 register */
>         BIT_MASK(JH7100_RST_U74) |
>         BIT_MASK(JH7100_RST_VP6_DRESET) |
>         BIT_MASK(JH7100_RST_VP6_BRESET) |
>         /* STATUS1 register */
>         BIT_MASK(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_DRESET) |
>         BIT_MASK(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_BRESET),
>         /* STATUS2 register */
>         BIT_MASK(JH7100_RST_E24) |
>         /* STATUS3 register */
>         0,
> };

BITMAP_FROM_U64() ?

> > > > > Also is there a macro for handling that we'd then need 4 commas on
> > > > > 32bit COMPILE_TEST and 2 commas on 64bit?
> > > > > If you have some other way in mind you'll have to be a lot more explicit again.
> > > > >
> > > > > The point of the jh7100_reset_asserted array is that it exactly
> > > > > mirrors the values of the status registers when the lines are
> > > > > asserted.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux