On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:48 PM <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@xxxxxxxxx> > > Add additional flag that can be set by drivers to indicate that the > driver will manage its own PWM state. When calling pwm_ops.apply the > driver applies the requested state change to the pwm_device reconciling, > if possible, any conflicting requests. > > Intel(R) Timed I/O devices support very limited PWM capabilities. The > duty cycle must always be 50% of the period. When changing one parameter > at a time through the sysfs interface, it isn't possible for the user or > the PWM subsystem to maintain this relation. > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tamal Saha <tamal.saha@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Sowjanya D <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Mark Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> These PWM changes clearly need to be reviewed by the PWM subsystem maintainers, and I think all of the output generation portions of this really need to go into the PWM subsystem. Yours, Linus Walleij