Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] ASPEED sgpio driver enhancement.

[Steven Lee <steven_lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The 07/21/2021 21:27, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:03 PM Steven Lee <steven_lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > AST2600 SoC has 2 SGPIO master interfaces one with 128 pins another one
> > with 80 pins, AST2500/AST2400 SoC has 1 SGPIO master interface that
> > supports up to 80 pins.
> > In the current driver design, the max number of sgpio pins is hardcoded
> > in macro MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO and the value is 80.
> >
> > For supporting sgpio master interfaces of AST2600 SoC, the patch series
> > contains the following enhancement:
> > - Convert txt dt-bindings to yaml.
> > - Update aspeed-g6 dtsi to support the enhanced sgpio.
> > - Support muiltiple SGPIO master interfaces.
> > - Support up to 128 pins by dts ngpios property.
> > - Pair input/output GPIOs instead of using 0 as GPIO input pin base and
> >   MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO as GPIO output pin base.
> > - Support wdt reset tolerance.
> > - Fix irq_chip issues which causes multiple sgpio devices use the same
> >   irq_chip data.
> > - Replace all of_*() APIs with device_*().
> >
> > Changes from v5:
> > * Squash v5 patch-05 and patch-06 to one patch.
> > * Remove MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO and corresponding design to make the gpio
> >   input/output pin base are determined by ngpios.
> >   For example, if MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO is 80 and ngpios is 10, the original
> >   pin order is as follows:
> >     Input:
> >     0 1 2 3 ... 9
> >     Output:
> >     80 81 82 ... 89
> >
> >   With the new design, pin order is changed as follows:
> >     Input:
> >     0 2 4 6 ... 18(ngpios * 2 - 2)
> >     Output:
> >     1 3 5 7 ... 19(ngpios * 2 - 1)
> > * Replace ast2600-sgpiom-128 and ast2600-sgpiom-80 compatibles by
> >   ast2600-sgpiom.
> > * Fix coding style issues.
> >
> > Changes from v4:
> > * Remove ngpios from dtsi
> > * Add ast2400 and ast2500 platform data.
> > * Remove unused macros.
> > * Add ngpios check in a separate patch.
> > * Fix coding style issues.
> >
> > Changes from v3:
> > * Split dt-bindings patch to 2 patches
> > * Rename ast2600-sgpiom1 compatible with ast2600-sgiom-128
> > * Rename ast2600-sgpiom2 compatible with ast2600-sgiom-80
> > * Correct the typo in commit messages.
> > * Fix coding style issues.
> > * Replace all of_*() APIs with device_*().
> >
> > Changes from v2:
> > * Remove maximum/minimum of ngpios from bindings.
> > * Remove max-ngpios from bindings and dtsi.
> > * Remove ast2400-sgpiom and ast2500-sgpiom compatibles from dts and
> >   driver.
> > * Add ast2600-sgpiom1 and ast2600-sgpiom2 compatibles as their max
> >   number of available gpio pins are different.
> > * Modify functions to pass aspeed_sgpio struct instead of passing
> >   max_ngpios.
> > * Split sgpio driver patch to 3 patches
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > * Fix yaml format issues.
> > * Fix issues reported by kernel test robot.
> >
> > Please help to review.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steven
> >
> > Steven Lee (9):
> >   dt-bindings: aspeed-sgpio: Convert txt bindings to yaml.
> >   dt-bindings: aspeed-sgpio: Add ast2600 sgpio
> >   ARM: dts: aspeed-g6: Add SGPIO node.
> >   ARM: dts: aspeed-g5: Remove ngpios from sgpio node.
> >   gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support
> >   gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add set_config function
> >   gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Move irq_chip to aspeed-sgpio struct
> >   gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Use generic device property APIs
> >   gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Return error if ngpios is not multiple of 8.
> >
> >  .../bindings/gpio/aspeed,sgpio.yaml           |  77 ++++++++
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/sgpio-aspeed.txt |  46 -----
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi              |   1 -
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g6.dtsi              |  28 +++
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c              | 178 +++++++++++-------
> >  5 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/aspeed,sgpio.yaml
> >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/sgpio-aspeed.txt
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> 
> The series looks good to me. Can the DTS and GPIO patches go into
> v5.15 separately?
> 

Hi Bart,

Thanks for the review.
Shall we do anything to make the patches go into v5.15 or wait for picking-up?

Steven

> Bart