Hi Matti,
Am 2021-05-28 17:42, schrieb Vaittinen, Matti:
Hi Bartosz,
On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 16:31 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vaittinen, Matti
<Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> > What makes things easy for me to maintain is active and happy
> > driver maintainers, so it is paramount that the file looks to
> > Michael
> > like something he wants to keep maintaining. This removes work
> > from me and Bartosz.
>
> I agree. When someone takes care of a driver, he should be happy
> with
> it. Period. And thanks to Michael for writing this driver and
> reviewing
> the patches. Reviewing is hard work.
>
> On the other hand, I don't enjoy writing code I am unhappy with
> either.
> And as this particular piece of code is not a paid task for me, I
> do
> this for fun. gpio-regmap is not mandatory for my drivers now. So,
> I'll
> just opt-out from this change. I'll happily use the gpio-regmap
> where
> it fits, when it fits.
>
I take it that path 2/3 is still good to go?
I don't think it had explicit ack from Michael yet - but I think it was
not objected either. I can respin it alone if needed but would help me
if you just pick it from this series (assuming it's Ok for others).
Just sent my R-b.
I'd pick the removal of the gpio_regmap_set_drvdata(), too. If you're
fine with it I'd submit a new patch with just that.
-michael
