Hi Bartosz, On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 16:31 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vaittinen, Matti > <Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [snip] > > > > What makes things easy for me to maintain is active and happy > > > driver maintainers, so it is paramount that the file looks to > > > Michael > > > like something he wants to keep maintaining. This removes work > > > from me and Bartosz. > > > > I agree. When someone takes care of a driver, he should be happy > > with > > it. Period. And thanks to Michael for writing this driver and > > reviewing > > the patches. Reviewing is hard work. > > > > On the other hand, I don't enjoy writing code I am unhappy with > > either. > > And as this particular piece of code is not a paid task for me, I > > do > > this for fun. gpio-regmap is not mandatory for my drivers now. So, > > I'll > > just opt-out from this change. I'll happily use the gpio-regmap > > where > > it fits, when it fits. > > > > I take it that path 2/3 is still good to go? I don't think it had explicit ack from Michael yet - but I think it was not objected either. I can respin it alone if needed but would help me if you just pick it from this series (assuming it's Ok for others). Best Regards Matti Vaittinen