On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:37 PM Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back > the private information. > Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it. > > If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on > devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as > there are other ways to log/see this during probe. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c > index 678ddd375891..9b780dc5d390 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ath79.c > @@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ static int ath79_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > ctrl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctrl), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!ctrl) > return -ENOMEM; > - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl); > > if (np) { > err = of_property_read_u32(np, "ngpios", &ath79_gpio_count); > @@ -290,13 +289,7 @@ static int ath79_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > girq->handler = handle_simple_irq; > } > > - err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &ctrl->gc, ctrl); > - if (err) { > - dev_err(dev, > - "cannot add AR71xx GPIO chip, error=%d", err); > - return err; > - } > - return 0; > + return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &ctrl->gc, ctrl); > } > > static struct platform_driver ath79_gpio_driver = { > -- > 2.31.1 > Applied, thanks! Bart