On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:17 PM Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back > the private information. > Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it. > > If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on > devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as > there are other ways to log/see this during probe. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c | 12 ++---------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c > index 0c0b445c75c0..7fa8c841081f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c > @@ -165,16 +165,8 @@ static int tps65910_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > skip_init: > - ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps65910_gpio->gpio_chip, > - tps65910_gpio); > - if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret); > - return ret; > - } > - > - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tps65910_gpio); > - > - return ret; > + return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps65910_gpio->gpio_chip, > + tps65910_gpio); > } > > static struct platform_driver tps65910_gpio_driver = { > -- > 2.31.1 > Applied, thanks! Bart