Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-tps6586x: remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe

[Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 9:52 AM Alexandru Ardelean
<aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
> the private information.
> Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.
>
> If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
> devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
> there are other ways to log/see this during probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-tps6586x.c | 12 +-----------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps6586x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps6586x.c
> index 9b6cc74f47c8..20c4f96f42f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps6586x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps6586x.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ static int tps6586x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct tps6586x_platform_data *pdata;
>         struct tps6586x_gpio *tps6586x_gpio;
> -       int ret;
>
>         pdata = dev_get_platdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>         tps6586x_gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> @@ -106,16 +105,7 @@ static int tps6586x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         else
>                 tps6586x_gpio->gpio_chip.base = -1;
>
> -       ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps6586x_gpio->gpio_chip,
> -                                    tps6586x_gpio);
> -       if (ret < 0) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
> -               return ret;
> -       }
> -
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tps6586x_gpio);
> -
> -       return ret;
> +       return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps6586x_gpio->gpio_chip, tps6586x_gpio);
>  }
>
>  static struct platform_driver tps6586x_gpio_driver = {
> --
> 2.31.1
>

Applied, thanks!

Bart