On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:07 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems the ordering is by name. Keep it that way. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patches applied, nice spring cleaning so why not! Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:03:37 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20210412140741.39946-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20210412140741.39946-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/3] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add ZynqMP pinctrl driver
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: change gpio nodenames
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 3/3] pinctrl: Add PIN_CONFIG_MODE_PWM to enum pin_config_param
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: gpio: add YAML description for rockchip,gpio-bank
- Index(es):
 |