On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:33 PM David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Sent: 15 March 2021 09:14 > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > For better readability and maintenance: use the (1UL << bit) for flag > > definitions. > > If the values ever get printed in hex the hex definitions are > actually more useful. Huh?! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] configfs: use (1UL << bit) for internal flags
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] configfs: use (1UL << bit) for internal flags
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:36:54 +0200
- In-reply-to: <6bc83972093a4be4ad163069a437ec25@AcuMS.aculab.com>
- References: <20210315091400.13772-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20210315091400.13772-3-brgl@bgdev.pl> <6bc83972093a4be4ad163069a437ec25@AcuMS.aculab.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v5 00/11] gpio: implement the configfs testing module
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH v5 02/11] configfs: use (1UL << bit) for internal flags
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- RE: [PATCH v5 02/11] configfs: use (1UL << bit) for internal flags
- From: David Laight
- [PATCH v5 00/11] gpio: implement the configfs testing module
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5] pinctrl: qcom: sc8180x: add ACPI probe support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Read "gpio-line-names" from a firmware node
- Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH v5 02/11] configfs: use (1UL << bit) for internal flags
- Next by thread: [PATCH v5 01/11] configfs: increase the item name length
- Index(es):
 |